Generalized Inequalities

8.7. Generalized InequalitiesΒΆ

A proper cone K can be used to define a generalized inequality, which is a partial ordering on Rn.

Definition 8.38

Let KβŠ†Rn be a proper cone. A partial ordering on Rn associated with the proper cone K is defined as

xβͺ―Ky⟺yβˆ’x∈K.

We also write xβͺ°Ky if yβͺ―Kx. This is also known as a generalized inequality.

A strict partial ordering on Rn associated with the proper cone K is defined as

xβ‰ΊKy⟺yβˆ’x∈K˚.

where K˚ is the interior of K. We also write xsuccKy if yβ‰ΊKx. This is also known as a strict generalized inequality.

When K=R+, then βͺ―K is same as usual ≀ and β‰ΊK is same as usual < operators on R+.

Example 8.20 (Nonnegative orthant and component-wise inequality)

The nonnegative orthant K=R+n is a proper cone. Then the associated generalized inequality βͺ―K means that

xβͺ―Ky⟹(yβˆ’x)∈R+n⟹xi≀yiβˆ€i=1,…,n.

This is usually known as component-wise inequality and usually denoted as xβͺ―y.

Example 8.21 (Positive semidefinite cone and matrix inequality)

The positive semidefinite cone S+nβŠ†Sn is a proper cone in the vector space Sn.

The associated generalized inequality means

Xβͺ―S+nY⟹Yβˆ’X∈S+n

i.e. Yβˆ’X is positive semidefinite. This is also usually denoted as Xβͺ―Y.

8.7.1. Minima and maximaΒΆ

The generalized inequalities (βͺ―K,β‰ΊK) w.r.t. the proper cone KβŠ‚Rn define a partial ordering over any arbitrary set SβŠ†Rn.

But since they may not enforce a total ordering on S, not every pair of elements x,y∈S may be related by βͺ―K or β‰ΊK.

Example 8.22 (Partial ordering with nonnegative orthant cone)

Let K=R+2βŠ‚R2. Let x1=(2,3),x2=(4,5),x3=(βˆ’3,5). Then we have

  • x1β‰Ίx2, x2succx1 and x3βͺ―x2.

  • But neither x1βͺ―x3 nor x1βͺ°x3 holds.

  • In general For any x,y∈R2, xβͺ―y if and only if y is to the right and above of x in the R2 plane.

  • If y is to the right but below or y is above but to the left of x, then no ordering holds.

Definition 8.39

We say that x∈SβŠ†Rn is the minimum element of S w.r.t. the generalized inequality βͺ―K if for every y∈S we have xβͺ―y.

  • x must belong to S.

  • It is highly possible that there is no minimum element in S.

  • If a set S has a minimum element, then by definition it is unique (Prove it!).

Definition 8.40

We say that x∈SβŠ†Rn is the maximum element of S w.r.t. the generalized inequality βͺ―K if for every y∈S we have yβͺ―x.

  • x must belong to S.

  • It is highly possible that there is no maximum element in S.

  • If a set S has a maximum element, then by definition it is unique.

Example 8.23 (Minimum element)

Consider K=R+n and S=R+n. Then 0∈S is the minimum element since 0βͺ―xβˆ€x∈R+n.

Example 8.24 (Maximum element)

Consider K=R+n and S={x|xi≀0βˆ€i=1,…,n}. Then 0∈S is the maximum element since xβͺ―0βˆ€x∈S.

There are many sets for which no minimum element exists. In this context we can define a slightly weaker concept known as minimal element.

Definition 8.41

An element x∈S is called a minimal element of S w.r.t. the generalized inequality βͺ―K if there is no element y∈S distinct from x such that yβͺ―Kx. In other words yβͺ―Kx⟹y=x.

Definition 8.42

An element x∈S is called a maximal element of S w.r.t. the generalized inequality βͺ―K if there is no element y∈S distinct from x such that xβͺ―Ky. In other words xβͺ―Ky⟹y=x.

  • The minimal or maximal element x must belong to S.

  • It is highly possible that there is no minimal or maximal element in S.

  • Minimal or maximal element need not be unique. A set may have many minimal or maximal elements.

Lemma 8.1

A point x∈S is the minimum element of S if and only if

SβŠ†x+K

Proof. Let x∈S be the minimum element. Then by definition xβͺ―Kyβˆ€y∈S. Thus

yβˆ’x∈Kβˆ€y∈S⟹ there exists some k∈Kβˆ€y∈S such that y=x+k⟹y∈x+Kβˆ€y∈S⟹SβŠ†x+K.

Note that k∈K would be distinct for each y∈S.

Now let us prove the converse.

Let SβŠ†x+K where x∈S. Thus

βˆƒk∈K such that y=x+kβˆ€y∈S⟹yβˆ’x=k∈Kβˆ€y∈S⟹xβͺ―Kyβˆ€y∈S.

Thus x is the minimum element of S since there can be only one minimum element of S.

x+K denotes all the points that are comparable to x and greater than or equal to x according to βͺ―K.

Lemma 8.2

A point x∈S is a minimal point if and only if

{xβˆ’K}∩S={x}.

Proof. Let x∈S be a minimal element of S. Thus there is no element y∈S distinct from x such that yβͺ―Kx.

Consider the set R=xβˆ’K={xβˆ’k|k∈K}.

r∈R⟺r=xβˆ’k for some k∈K⟺xβˆ’r∈K⟺rβͺ―Kx.

Thus xβˆ’K consists of all points r∈Rn which satisfy rβͺ―Kx. But there is only one such point in S namely x which satisfies this. Hence

{xβˆ’K}∩S={x}.

Now let us assume that {xβˆ’K}∩S={x}. Thus the only point y∈S which satisfies yβͺ―Kx is x itself. Hence x is a minimal element of S.

xβˆ’K represents the set of points that are comparable to x and are less than or equal to x according to βͺ―K.